What if the court rules in favor of the wrong doers? What if the crime was done to stop the victim from preventing the sun to shine? And the criminal is freed after doing you harm. This is the verdict of the UK court that cleared the group of Greenpeace leftists of criminal damages they have inflicted to a power station.
The UK Maidstone Crown Court set free six people connected with the communist environmentalist vandals who stopped the operation of Kingsnorth coal-fired power station and painted the plant’s chimney with the group’s slogan. They have entered the premises disregarding the trespassing law and have caused the power station $60,000 damages to property. The vandals’ argument is that their actions were made to save lives and protecting property that may be damaged by global warming. And the court ruled in their favor citing that "threat of global warming justifies breaking the law.” The strategy of defense on the basis of “lawful excuse” worked with the UK court where Her Majesty’s government have allowed environmentalist groups free restraint to campaign against coal and oil on energy industry.
The court based its judgment on the smoke and not on where the fire is. Such reasoning devoid of fact but based on speculations and hypothesis which are not sure to happen was admitted in the UK court. And the culprits will be free to sow terror and havocs on property –leading to the downfall of connected industries- just for the “lawful excuse” that there will be global warming a decade or centuries from now! Man-made global warming is an ongoing subject of debate and only the interested party are forcing the governments to make it compulsory guidelines. US, India, and China do not approve of the global warming hoax and this UK court freed the vandals in view of global warming legerdemain! They are creating an obnoxious precedence leading the bridge to nowhere. I am not a lawyer but a common man or even the learned individual may take a hard time to be convinced that this is a lawful judgement.
Read my source
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Posts
2 comments:
Granted that the fumes from coal-fired power stations are not the only culprits for the increase in greenhouse gases in the atmosphere, should we tolerate them? Or should we tolerate more of them?
I'd like to know your answers to these questions before I get back to you on some other things, especially about people taking the law into their hands. Some stimulating discussion might ensure from here.
*ensue
Post a Comment